Defending the Right to Protect Us From Ourselves

khloeguns

Rightfully so, citizens and politicians alike are taking time out to re-analyze our Second Amendment rights. The recent string of horrific shootings (Aurora, Sandy Hook, etc.) has prompted a national conversation concerning a debate that has had citizens on either side of the fence since its creation. It is important to acknowledge that the Second Amendment was created in a far different time than today – a time where a fledgling nation needed to quiet qualms of upheaval, insure protection against potential oppression, and equip paranoia in a ‘fighting fire with fire’ approach. Laws in the early days following the American Revolution were not as articulate nor as concrete then as they are now. Primitive ways of punishment for law-breaking abounded. Lacking a standard organized way of dealing with those who decided to turn criminal prompted vigilante justice. Possession of a gun was about as common as owning a set of kitchen cutlery.

            Times may be more advanced, but guns are more prevalent now than ever. The right allowing every citizen to own a gun of their choosing should in theory level the playing field.  But it does not and will never. Even with stricter gun laws large-capacity magazines, automatic and semi-automatic firearms would still be present illegally.

            Many organizations, such as Mayors Against Illegal Guns and CeaseFire, have been calling for strengthening gun laws to include stronger background checks. Instead of restricting and limiting we should be considering amending and altering. We’re not dealing with misuse of weapons by law-abiding citizens so much as with mentally-ill individuals equipped with unbridled high-powered, rapid-fire instruments of death. A lot of people are talking about granting ownership to include only the sane and according heavy artillery to only military personnel and law enforcement. I think it should go a step further.

            Recently, a woman named Wendy Button wrote to the New York Times appealing to have her Second Amendment rights relinquished due to her diminished capacity to control her decisions because of depression. She recounts the horror of a person attempting to break into her house; an event so terrifying she considered buying a gun. Then, she rethought her decision – would her mental illness inhibit her in such a way that she might use the gun for evil? Would she try to take her own life or the lives of others? I applaud her for her self-analysis, awareness, and civil responsibility. Most are not that intuitive.

            “Responsible” gun-ownership should extend past the simple registration of a gun, passing a criminal background check, possessing a license to carry, and keeping the gun in a lockbox. If you want to keep a firearm in the house then EVERYONE in the house should have to submit to both a background criminal AND psychological check. When will we learn that all too often the one committing the heinous acts of mass shootings are not the gun owners themselves?

            So yes. The laws need to be changed. They need to be stricter. They need to be less accommodating. But they cannot be expected to eradicate the illegal or legal prevalence of guns in our society. Instead, America needs to wake up, halt the political ticker-tape parade and recognize what’s really wrong here.

            We need to stop overlooking and ignoring mental wellness in our society. 

Advertisements

28 thoughts on “Defending the Right to Protect Us From Ourselves

  1. i would like to tell you that your blog is more and more interesting each day! I look forward to reading; will you be in the Times regularly?

  2. I just dont understand how ud be able to get everyone to agree to a psychological background check?? Say a standard household has 5 people… just 10 families alone wud accumulate massive amounts of paperwork, times, not to mention money! In fact, where wud all the money to fund this come from? Taxpayers pockets? Dont get me wrong.. love the idea but itd be tough to establish.

  3. It’s refreshing to see someone with sense and clarity write about gun control from a mental illness perspective. I’ve been wading through a lot of junk since its been in the news so much lately and no one talks about the psychological part of gun violence. it’d be really difficult to get so many people to commit to a psych evaul much less get their whole family involved but the idea is nice.

  4. Hi, this is my first visit and I have to say, I really like your writing style. I’m very interested in your posts, please keep up the good work!

  5. Why not? We already give background checks when buying a gun – it would;t be so hard to include additional info like what they’re suggesting here. I, for one, think its a great idea. We make it too easy to get guns these days and store it around our children and families. thank you for bringing this up, AAES. And! I just would like to tell you that your blog is awesome =)

  6. in my blog i usually just write the post and publish it. i haven’t been putting much effort into editing or improving my posts. looks like that is something i need to work on.

  7. great blog! quite helpful info here. why i was not able to find it earlier?!? anyways i’ve subscribed to you so keep on with your good work

  8. just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that i have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. any way i’ll be subscribing to your feed and i hope you post again soon

Speak Up! And Comment Below

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s